The Cubicle Chronicles

Friday, January 20, 2006

Home-Le$$-Ness

Good Morning Fortunate Ones!

If you're reading this, you're probably pretty fortunate...


Think about it. You're educated enough to read, you have access to a computer, and better yet, the internet....and I'm willing to bet you even have a place to live and perhaps a job.... (well, except Leslie...jk) I guess we may sometimes forget, or blatantly don't give a shit, that we are more fortunate than others.

If you live near or in a city, you've probably been introduced to the homeless. Homeless people are a diverse bunch, that for one dozen reasons or another, can't afford a place to live, don't have a source of income other than pan-handling, and usually have a strange pungent odor.

Two major factors that I think contribute to homelessness:

1. Mental Illness - ever wonder why that homeless guy down the street is mumbling to himself, twitches, and has emotional outbursts followed by periods of silently staring into space? Well, one of the largest contributors to homelessness is the closing of mental facilities or releasing of patients due to budgetary reasons; FYI: most released/kicked out mentally ill patients don't get their engineering or MBA degrees and then contribute to the corporate infrastructure, nor have they developed the skills to adapt to that environment; thus business people who have the money to help, don't give a shit about them.

2. Poor Shitty Family: Perhaps homeless Tom grew up in poverty. Mommy & daddy were stupid losers, which further explained why they would give birth to a child given their financial & social situation, as well as not providing that child the stability and education they needed to adapt to the outside world. The child grew up with the wrong crowd without education or guidance, and then found that they could not make it in the workplace because of emotional, disciplinary, or education-related reasons.

It seems as though people have a problem with homelessness and choose to ignore it or just feed a bum some change when they are bothered. Out of sight, out of mind; just don't bother me while I'm drinking my caramel non-fat Machiato...

As a capitalistic society, we pretty much say "tough luck, get a job, and fuck off". However, this contradicts our silly "Christian-based" and socialist inspired "everyone should be happy" ideals. Should we give a shit? Should we give help? Should we give money?

I believe that you are a selfish prick if you give a homeless person ANY money.

You're not helping; you're just buying your way out of an uncomfortable situation and/or guilt, in efforts to feel like you're Mother Theresa. If you really wanted to make an impact, you'd give him an education.... you'd give him clothing... you'd give him something to eat or nourishment.... you'd give him a job... or you'd give the money to somebody who could provide him with those things...


Now I'm not saying there's an answer for homelessness, because there isn't an answer. But we can change our actions and perceptions of what is "help" to a homeless person.

By giving money to the homeless are we really helping them, or are we helping ourselves to feel better about their homelessness?

Do you think a society-wide attitudinal change could spur the fortunate to help those in need through education, training, and opportunity, or at least donate money to people who would be able to organize such an edeavor?

Give us your thoughts....

Don's thoughts right now: "I love coffee....."

Friday, January 06, 2006

Objective Aynd Randy...

Happy New Year!

I hope that everyone who reads this has taken time to reflect upon the events of the past year and has unearthed the comfort that comes with feeling pride from a year without regret. If there have been obstacles or trials in your past year, let them be stepping stones to a higher ground of enlightenment.

Speaking of individualistic empowerment and reasoning to happiness, I watched a spectacular documentary last night called "Ayn Rand: A Sense of Life"; I highly recommend it to anyone. For those not in the know, Ayn Rand was a Russian writer who wrote about Individualism to such a powerful degree that she could be considered a great philosopher in her own right.

Ayn Rand labeled her school of thought as "Objectivism", where the main posit is that there is an objective and concrete reality. Man's responsibility to himself, is to objectively interpret reality with his mind through logic and reason. She viewed science as one method of interpretation of reality, however has inherit limitations in its research and methodology. She viewed religion, god, communism, socialism, altruism (in the sense of sacrificing ones' self for the group), and selflessness as all evil!

The main tenants of her philosophy are that the individual is to be held above all else, idealists are stronger than conformists, logic and reason are essential for happiness, one must weave their dreams into reality, and that capitalism is the only government system that may allow an individual to truly be happy.

My questions to the intellectuals are the following:

It appears that Ayn Rand preached of "Individual Intellectualism", where in order to attain true happiness, the individual must approach his/her life with logic and reason.

With that said, is it really true that "ignorance is bliss", or is it wasted life?

Ayn Rand questioned, "people intuitively want to find out why things exist and how they have come to be, and some attribute it to god...but why are people so fearful to question where god came from and why they naturally feel they must make sense of things." (paraphrased) Ayn Rand attributed the belief in god to intellectual laziness and the inability to conceive of an infinite reality.

Is belief in god as a creator intellectual laziness? Is reality infinite? Which do you think is more probable?

Discuss. I need to go take a deuce.....