Oh-Be-Cities; "phat" or just "fat"?
I'm no Calvin Klein model, nor would I want to be. However, just for my own amusement, I do occasionally strut down the hallway of my residence in nothing but my boxer briefs with my arms swinging, head bobbing, and enter my bedroom with a dashing left turn, pause, and stare at my "awe-struck" dresser with my best Blue Steal pose. To the relief of my neighbors, I try to keep the blinds at least 3/4 drawn.
History for developed countries, and current times in struggling "3rd world" countries depicts the thin body types of society to be indicative of the lower income, physical labor-oriented, and the presumingly "low socio-economic", poor end of the social ladder who are thinner because they cannot afford an excess, or even enough for that matter of food and sustenance. On the "high socio-economic" end of the ladder, the wealthy are depicted with increased size in terms of fat percentage and overall health, presumingly because the wealthy can afford enough, and even excess amounts of food to sustain themselves. La-Di-Da, Da-Da......
However, as one of the wealthiest countries in the world, we need to wake the fuck up because obesity has "weighed-in" the costs:
- Obesity costs the U.S. $117 billion a year indirectly
- Obesity costs more than 39 million lost work days each year
- Three-fourths of the $1.4 trillion the U.S. spends on health care is to treat chronic illnesses, many of which are tied to obesity and overweight (United Health Foundation, 2004)
Walmart has been ridiculed lately in the news for sending a memo to hire healthier employees to try to reduce their health care costs associated with the above; but, should they be ridiculed?
Or is it us as a society that should be ridiculed for allowing over 31% of our population to become obese?
You want a cure for obesity? Here, I won't even charge you $19.99:
- Stop eating fast food; they'll get the hint and start making their menu healthy when the public won't eat their shit.
- Get off your fat-ass and exercise; 20 minutes, 3 times a week...you've got time jack-ass!
- Stop making excuses; "oh, it's my genetics"...."oh, I'm large and in charge"..."oh, I like myself the way I am"... We've spent too much time coddling the weak minded and the weak willed, why should tax payers pay for your fat ass to get health care for your self-inflicted obesity?
The topic today; "Obesity", is it okay, or should we as a society start lighting a fire under some fat asses?
What right do obese people have complaining that seats on airplanes and school desks are not "ergonomically" correct? Shouldn't we be asking the obese person why they're not ergonomically correct?
What do yall think? And just for yucks here are the top ten fattest cities in the country:
- The Top 10 Fattest Cities -
- Houston
- Philadelphia - "Too many Philly Cheese-Steak Hoagies"
- Detroit - "Too much winter!"
- Memphis - "Too much BBQ"
- Chicago - "Too much Deep Dish"
- Dallas
- New Orleans - "Too much Etoufee"
- New York - "Too many big slices"
- Las Vegas - "Too much greed"
- San Antonio
I guess everything in Texas is bigger!

15 Comments:
Wallmart sucks on so many levels it isn't worth discussing. The cities thing is interesting, the top 10 cities have larger than average black population. Do you think that has something to do with it? Or do you think it is the larger than average poor population you can't afford gym memberships? I don't know, I'm skinny or scrawny if you want to be a dick about it. So I've never had these concerns.
By
Anonymous, at 10:04 AM
In the past, it was similar as it is now in foreign countries. In America, it was considered to be attractive to be not only overweight (not fat), and pale. This meant that you had enough money to eat; as well as didn't labor in the sun.
People have this ass-backwards. I am not going to condone smoking. I think that if you want to, you should. If you don't want to, don't. Taxes on cigarettes are higher than ever (almost 6.00/pack in Michigan). Although it may cause heart disease, and lung cancer, I can think of something worse that is not getting any attention:
Fast food.
Now, I would be willing to lay my life on the line that fast food (with their high-sodium, high-calorie, high-fat, and low nutrient content) is responsible for more deaths than cigarettes. It can cause diabetes (cigarettes don't); Heart disease (same problem); high cholesterol (cigs don't). Cigarettes are just a general annoyance for non-smokers.
Well, suppose this scenario:
I am in class. Someone just went to Taco Bell and ordered a huge combo. I smell the food. I don't like it. Now, what the fuck would happen if I asked them to "throw it out" (the equivalant of asking a smoker to "put it out")? It would be wrong. I would get my ass kicked because they have some horse meat still left on that greasy paper.
Not to mention, I had a dietician when I was on dialysis who was fat. She was trying to tell ME what to eat...and she was a lard-ass!
Look, it's simple:
If you're fat, it ain't glands. It's super-sizing.
If you're on a plane AND YOU TAKE UP MORE THAN ONE SEAT -- pay for it. Half your ass it sitting on it. You are making it so one person cannot get on that plane. That's like saying someone should be allowed to fly for free.
They are firing people at some companies for smoking at home. Well, why not fire them for eating enough to fill a dumpster? It's about (if not more) the same in health care costs.
You forgot the best saying, "More of me to love".
As a former fat-ass (I was, at one point, 170 lbs. on a 5'2" frame - trimmed to 110-115, depending on bloat), I know people can lose weight. IF THEY WANT TO; plus keep it off. (I did for...8 years.) If they don't, it looks like Mickey D's will stay in business...not to mention, doctors. Also, you spend more money on clothes.
Up next: Suing the clothing companies for making one pay more for fabric.
And quite fucking with the smokers. We pay more in taxes. Why not tax the fatties?
Sorry. I just hate people who bitch about being fat while eating a double cheeseburger. But you know this. And, it ain't glands. It's a lack of self-control.
Take a gander at the documentary "Super-Size Me". If you buy fast food after that..you're dumber than a sack of wet squirrels.
By
Anonymous, at 11:09 AM
don't mess with texas.
By
Anonymous, at 1:10 PM
The D.O.N. is back on the scene!
Yo, guess who has access once again?!
By
Don the "Head Chimp", at 1:54 PM
No fat chicks
By
Anonymous, at 2:48 PM
Oruga, moderate eaters...hmm.
I have to challenge you on this.
I don't believe you can get fat from breathing air. You can get fat from:
1. eating too much
2. having many lattes
3. not moving much.
The people you say are moderate eaters? I have seen them. You know what they do? They go to a restaurant, order a salad (when they're in front of people); then they go home...and pig out...alone.
Again, as a former fatass, I used those tricks. The old, "I haven't eaten ANYTHING all day long" (and I ordered a salad..when, in actuality, I stood around and snacked all day prior). "I exercise, it won't come off. I have thyroid problems." You do? So do I. I have an underactive thyroid. Right now. I am not fat. There goes the argument for glands.
People who are fat, fine, be fat. Fine with me. But then don't bitch about not getting laid; paying for 2 seats on a flight; and high cholesterol.
Is obesity really a disease? Or is it simply an epidemic?
I suppose now I can say my inability to quit smoking is a disease. It stems from my oral fixation as a child.
Also, I will not date a guy who has larger boobs than me.
By
Anonymous, at 3:04 PM
I am going to take a stab. Don has access. Two cool stipes to da man.
By
Anonymous, at 3:07 PM
Let the Data speak
I agree with Leslie in that it is an epidemic, not a "disease".
I did a little fact checking, and I created a spreadsheet with the top ten fattest and fittest cities in the country with some additional statistics. If you'd like to see the data, let me know, I'll email it to you. I ran some analyses with the data I collected from the 2000 Census:
There are significant differences between the top ten fattest and the top ten fittest cities in the country on the following dimensions:
Education: The percentage of bachelor degree holders are significantly different, whereas the fatter cities had a significantly less percentage of a bachelor-educated population than the fittest.
Individuals below the poverty line: The percentage of individuals below the poverty line were significantly different between the fattest and fittest cities; whereas the fatter cities had significantly higher percentages of individuals below the poverty line than the fitter.
Race percentages: In agreement with Mr. Burnz, there were significant differences between the fittest and fattest cities on only two race variables, that being "African American" and "White"; whereas the fatter cities had higher percentages of African Americans and lower percentages of Whites in their population than the fittest. Hispanics were not found to be signiricantly different.
For those not as statistically inclined, finding significant mean differences between groups with a low N (n=20) is harder to accomplish than with a larger sample. In addition, significance was held to the same research standard of p<.05. (for stat monkeys, I ran independent T-tests in SPSS using the top ten fattest versus the top ten fittest as the grouping variable)
In summary, based upon the data, it appears that the times have indeed changed where "fatter" no longer is a symbol of high socio-economic status, education, or of good status. On the contrary, it appears that obesity is more related to lower education and lower income. The racial differences, I would argue coincide with the general condition of racial differences in the country, whereas, African Americans have lower education and income in comparison to Whites.
By
Don the "Head Chimp", at 4:23 PM
If we are to decrease the amount of obese people in this country it will have to be market driven...I think it is fair to say we enjoy our large portions and fast food...it all goes back to the kids and McDonalds...I think beginning in the early years, you should take health or nutrition every year in school...from what I can remember that wasn't taught. Then perhaps McDoanlds can stop marketing to kids...I had a marketing prof tell me that it was a brillant move by them...creates customers for life. I don't think sin taxes are the way either, people still drink, smoke cigs...perhaps early education is the way and hopefully they'll be the ones to place the pressure on the market...a side note...when in federal court, the marshalls don't like it if you stand in the middle of a hallway...
By
Anonymous, at 5:29 PM
Don - Jesus Christ, man. Do you do any actual work at work? Gathering census data and doing t-tests on company time... no wonder the IT department banned you for awhile.
Les - Is a sack of wet squirrels more dumb than a sack of dry (or perhaps moist) squirrels?
Utlaw - If you think Marshalls are bad when you're just standing around, try rubbing your genitals on them.
Oruga - I think you are my new favorite person on the planet... though I haven't figured out if I am laughing with you or at you. If you haven't started your own blog, please do so immediately.
Terry - I'm pretty sure I'm laughing with you.
- mdbm
By
D a n i e l, at 6:22 PM
Yes Oruga, this is focused mainly upon the phenomenon within the American population.
In a society where the average person is not subject to a lack of resources or food, the education of what food is nutrituous and the income to afford higher quality and healthier food options creates this inverse of obesity.
In concurence with UTlaw, I think nutritional education as well as a change in social attitude is necessary to get people to start eating healthier. And like Les said, "Super Size Me" is an excellent illustration of the impact of excessive fast food consumption, and should be required viewing in health class.
If there were a higher demand for fresh produce and quality foods, rather than the endorphine-releasing, artery-clogging, high-sodium crap that is pushed by commercials for fast food and in the frozen food section of the grocery store, the prices for those products would decrease. Not only are people eating unhealthy foods, they are also eating them in larger portions!
I must admit, I would consider myself an impulse eater. If I want some chicken wings, I'm going to eat me some damn chicken wings! However, I exercise and try to eat in moderation to counteract the impact of the fatty, but "oh so good" chicken wings...smothered with spicy garlic sauce and served with blue cheese dressing and celery....ahhhhhhhhhh...
Anyway, our bodies have a particular balance of input and output that is required to keep us feeling and looking healthy. With that said, this balance is different for each individual. Some people have to maintain a low input and high output ratio, or may be fortunate with a high input and low output ratio, and any variation between the two extremes. It is an individual's responsibility to discover their own healthy balance and do it for themselves. I have no sympathy for those who choose not to abide by their own body's healthy balance.
Basically, obesity is controlable by the individual. The thyroid and other problems that occur are not the cause of the obesity, they are symptoms of an imbalance between controllable and uncontrolable factors.
Controlable factors:
- how much you eat
- the type of food you eat
- your amount of physical activity
- your self-esteem
- your will and motivation
Un-controlable factors:
- genetic inheritence of risk factors (i.e. heart disease, high cholesterol, blood pressure, etc.)
- social & advertising pressure
- Environmental limitations and/or availability of food
Even though you may not be able to control whether or not the "uncontrolable factors" exist, you can control how you respond to them by the "controlable factors".
By
Don the "Head Chimp", at 9:22 AM
I couldn't agree with you more, Don.
Like I said, being fat is a choice. Going from one extreme to another, I am one example of this choice. I wanted my ass to look good in jeans. It didn't before. Now, it does.
You control several things..like:
When you go grocery shopping and pick out either produce or candy bars, whole milk or skim, etc. etc.
You control where your car goes: To the drive-thru or to your home to eat something quality.
Also, unless you have a disability (which most people do not) you can control how much you move.
You can control portions.
Another good motto to live by: It will be there tomorrow. ("It" meaning "food". Saying that instead of eating a giant pizza, you can take it, slice by slice. And without all the sausage; one day at a time.
Control of consumption. Control of exercise. This is one area where YOU are in control. Not anyone else. You. If one is fat, one can only blame him/herself.
By
Anonymous, at 2:04 PM
I wonder though...if adverstising were to stop for junk food...and ads for fruits and vegetables were shown being consumed at parties, while watching the football game, having a great time at the beach, etc...if that would have any significance on weight issue...The Diamond people...whatever that large is one...I think De Beers...they started the whole you gotta by your gal a diamond for the engagement...it was an ad campaign...before that...there was no notion that you had to buy a diamond ring...now look today how common place a thought it is...its part of our social scheme about weddings...also..diamonds aren't even that valuable...the bastards who own the mines have them stockpiled and purposely limit how much goes into the market and feed us with slogans like "Diamonds are Forever"....so I don't we think we have as much control as we think we do...those marketers are smart people......look what they did to valentines day, christmas...andn how about the alcohol people...they never show ads of people waking up the next day with hangovers, hitting their spouse in a drunken rage, killing someone because they were drinking and driving...do they?????????? Sure don't...instead they relate their product to having fun and getting laid by beautiful woman...do you think people would eat junk if the ads showed people eating the Big Mac then dying from a heart attack????????????
By
Anonymous, at 8:13 PM
Utlaw is my hero.
By
Anonymous, at 11:53 PM
I agree. The lack of accountability has become more prevalent amongst the "priviledged." For example, if a person gains 150lbs. over a short period of time, it's much easier for them to blame it on their thyroid, or some other uncontrollable factor; rather than their fixation on cupcakes, fried chicken, and weeknight reality television on Telemundo. To state the obvious, three main factors contribute to weight gain: 1/3 of each: diet,
exercise, and genetics. This has already been proven. I sincerely agree with your points, Don. However, you'd have to give credit to certain shady companies, because they've created a beautiful marketing ploy on this epidemic!
By
Anonymous, at 2:24 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home